RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01473
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period
27 Sep 12 through 26 Sep 13, be replaced in her permanent
evaluation record by the revised EPR signed 15 Oct 13.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Her EPR was uploaded in error, her rater could not explain why
the incorrect EPR was submitted after the corrected EPR had
already been signed. Also, she disagreed with her report due to
the mark down in Section III Block 2, which is why no signature
is reflected.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on
4 Jan 93.
On 31 Aug 14, the applicant was furnished an honorable
discharge, and was credited with 21 years, 7 months, and 27 days
of active service.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIDE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence
of an error or an injustice. The applicant has not exhausted
all administrative avenues of relief by first filing an appeal
through the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB) under the
provisions of AFI 36-2406. DPSIDE recommends the applicant
submit a new AF Form 948, Application for Correction/Removal of
Evaluation Records, with all required supporting documentation,
through the vMPF/ Evaluation Appeals found under the Most
Popular Applications. If the administrative appeal is not
successful, the applicant may resubmit the DD Form 149,
Application for Correction of Military Records, and the results
of the ERAB administrative review, to SAF/MRBR for processing
to the AFBCMR.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPDIDE evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
In response, the applicant reiterates that she would like the
EPR replaced in her official military record because of the
verbiage used in the report.
The applicants complete response is at Exhibit E.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We note the
comments of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR)
indicating the applicant has not exhausted her administrative
remedies by appealing the contested EPR through the ERAB.
However, in view of the fact the applicant has retired since the
OPR advisory was rendered in this case, said avenue of relief is
no longer available to the applicant. Accordingly, she has
exhausted her administrative remedies and her request is ripe
for adjudication at this level. After a thorough review of the
evidence of record and the applicants complete submission, we
are not convinced that corrective action is warranted. In this
respect, we note the applicant has provided a signed EPR
rendered for the same period as the contested report. Although
the contested EPR reflects differing verbiage, they have the
same overall rating of Truly among the Best (5). In view of
the fact that the changes were minor and the rating or comments
were not negative we could find no reason to believe the EPR was
not accurate as filed. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to
the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the
requested relief.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-01473 in Executive Session on 18 Jun 15, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Mar 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIDE, dated 20 Apr 15.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 May 15.
Exhibit E. Message, Applicant, dated 5 Jun 15.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03088
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) is the highest level of administrative appeal within the Department of the Air Force. In accordance with AFI 36-2401,...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00407
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDE recommends denial indicating the applicant has not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief prior to seeking correction of her military record. The change the applicant is requesting is not for minor corrections, so she will need to provide a memorandum...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00290
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) is the highest level of administrative appeal within the Department of the Air Force. AFPC/DPSIDE has reviewed this application...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02149
In accordance with Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2401, Correcting Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Reports, if the applicant wishes to replace the contested EPR, he must provide the re-accomplished, corrected report that is in support of his appeal, in a digitally signed format to the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB). Furthermore, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603, Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR), the applicant has not exhausted all available avenues of...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00036
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDE recommends denial noting the applicant has not exhausted her administrative remedies. A review of the applicants request determined her first avenue of relief is through the Evaluation Report Appeals Board (ERAB). A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIDE evaluation is at...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01687
In accordance with AFI 36-2406, Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Systems, chapter 10, paragraph 10.1.1: The Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB) was established to provide all Air Force personnel with an avenue of relief for correcting errors or injustices in evaluations at the lowest possible level. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04955
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant has not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief by not first filing an appeal of her OPR through the Evaluation Report Appeals Board (ERAB) under the provisions...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01134
The Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB) has substantiated that an error or injustice occurred but will not remove the EPR without a new report being accomplished. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDE recommends denial indicating the applicant has not exhausted all available avenues of administrative...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04040
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDE recommends denial noting the applicant has not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief. The Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) is the highest level of administrative appeal within the Department of the Air Force. The Air Force Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR) has reviewed this application and noted the applicant has not filed an appeal through...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00530
On 31 Jan 13, the applicant participated in one of the contested FAs where he attained an overall composite score of 33.50 points, which constituted an unsatisfactory rating AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDE recommends denial indicating the applicant has not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief prior to seeking correction of his military record. If the administrative appeal is not successful, the applicant may resubmit the DD Form 149, Application for Correction of...